Comparing stand-level volume growth and yield predictions from time-explicit, state-space, and simultaneous approaches across complex mixed forest stands in the Acadian Region of North America

Cen Chen, Baburam Rijal, Aaron Weiskittel, John A. Kershaw

Abstract


Stand-level growth and yield models are computationally simple and have moderate demands on input information, but their applications have largely been limited to single-species and even-aged stands. State-space and simultaneous approaches that are not explicitly functions of time potentially extend the applicability of stand-level growth and yield models to mixed-species and/or multi-cohort stands where age (and the period of stand growth that often is derived as the difference in ages) may not be available and/or suitable predictors. The Acadian Forest, dominated by naturally-regenerated and mixed-species stands of primarily multi-cohort structure, offers an ideal framework for a comprehensive assessment of alternative approaches, such as time-explicit, state-space, and simultaneous approaches’ performance in stand-level growth and yield predictions across a wide range of complex forest stands. We conducted a comparative assessment utilizing an extensive database from this region. It was found that the three approaches were highly consistent in providing relatively accurate and largely unbiased stand-level growth and yield predictions. The time-explicit approach had a simplistic form but similar prediction performances comparable to the other two more complex modeling approaches. In comparison, the simultaneous approach, despite being path-invariant, was computationally challenging and offered limited improvements from the other approaches. Our findings showed potential applicability of stand-level growth and yield models beyond single-species and even-aged forests.

Keywords


Uneven-aged stands; mixed stands; growth and yield models; forest management; base-age-invariance; path-invariance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bates, D.; Maechler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Bechtold, W.A.; Patterson, P.L. (Eds). 2005. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program—national sampling design and estimation procedures. General Technical Report SRS-GTR-80. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-80

Borders, B.E. 1989. Systems of equations in forest stand modeling. Forest Science, 35, 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/35.2.548

Borders, B.E.; Bailey, R.L. 1986. A compatible system of growth and yield equations for slash pine fitted with restricted three-stage least squares. Forest Science, 32, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/32.1.185

Burkhart, H.E.; Tomé, M. 2012. Modeling forest trees and stands. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht. 458 pp.

Castedo-Dorado, F.; Diéguez-Aranda, U.; Álvarez-González, J.G. 2007. A growth model for Pinus radiata D. Don stands in north-western Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 64, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007023

Chen, C.; Weiskittel, A.; Bataineh, M.; MacLean, D.A. 2017a. Even low levels of spruce budworm defoliation affect mortality and ingrowth but net growth is more driven by competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47, 1546–1556. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2017-0012

Chen, C.; Weiskittel, A.; Bataineh, M.; MacLean, D.A. 2017b. Evaluating the influence of varying levels of spruce budworm defoliation on annualized individual tree growth and mortality in Maine, USA and New Brunswick, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 396, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.026

Chen, C.; Weiskittel, A.; Bataineh, M.; MacLean, D.A. 2018. Refining the Forest Vegetation Simulator for projecting the effects of spruce budworm defoliation in the Acadian Region of North America. Forestry Chronicle, 94, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2018-037

Chen, C.; Kershaw Jr., J.; Weiskittel, A.; McGarrigle, E. 2023. Can a multistage approach improve individual tree mortality predictions across the complex mixed-species and managed forests of eastern North America? Forest Ecosystems, 10, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2023.100086

Chivhenge, E.; Ray, D.G.; Weiskittel, A.R.; Woodall, C.W.; D'Amato, A.W. 2024. Evaluating the development and application of stand density index for the management of complex and adaptive forests. Current Forestry Reports, 10, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w

Clutter, J.L. 1963. Compatible growth and yield models for loblolly pine. Forest Science, 9, 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/9.3.354

Cieszewski, C.J. 2021. UTADA: Unified Theory of the Algebraic Differences Approaches—Derivation of Dynamic Site Equations from Yield-Site Relationships. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural Resource Sciences, 13, 36–43.

Cieszewski, C.J.; Bailey, R.L. 2000. Generalized algebraic difference approach: theory based derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes. Forest Science, 46, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.1.116

Cieszewski, C.J.; Bella, I.E. 1993. Modeling density-related lodgepole pine height growth, using Czarnowski's stand dynamics theory. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 2499–2506. https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-311

Cieszewski, C.J.; Strub, M. 2018. Comparing properties of self-referencing models based on nonlinear-fixed-effects versus nonlinear-mixed-effects modeling approaches. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural Resource Sciences, 10, 46–57.

Diéguez-Aranda, U.; Álvarez González, J.G.; Barrio Anta, M.; Rojo Alboreca, A. 2005. Site quality equations for Pinus sylvestris L. plantations in Galicia (North-Western Spain). Annals of Forest Science, 62, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005006

Diéguez-Aranda, U.; Dorado, F.C.; González, J.G.A.; Alboreca, A.R. 2006. Dynamic growth model for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantations in Galicia (north-western Spain). Ecological Modelling, 191, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.026

Fang, Z.; Bailey, R.L.; Shiver, B.D. 2001. A multivariate simultaneous prediction system for stand growth and yield with fixed and random effects. Forest Science, 47, 550–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/47.4.550

Fridman, J.; Ståhl, G. 2001. A three-step approach for modeling tree mortality in Swedish forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580152632856

Garcia, O. 1994. The state-space approach in growth modeling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24, 1894–1903. https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-244

Garcia, O. 2009. A simple and effective forest stand mortality model. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural Resource Sciences, 1, 1–9.

Garcia, O. 2011. A parsimonious dynamic stand model for interior spruce in British Columbia. Forest Science, 57, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/57.4.265

Garcia, O. 2017. Cohort aggregation modelling for complex forest stands: Spruce-aspen mixtures in British Columbia. Ecological Modelling, 343, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.10.020

Harry, J.; Smith, G.; Breadon, R.E. 1964. Combined variable equations and volume-basal area ratios for total cubic foot volumes of the commercial trees of BC. Forestry Chronicle, 40, 258–261. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc40258-2

Hirsch, R. 1991. Validation samples. Biometrics, 47, 1193–1194.

Kozak, A.; Kozak, R. 2003. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-022

Kuehne, C.; Puhlick, J.J.; Weiskittel, A.R. 2018. Ecological Reserves in Maine: Initial results of long-term monitoring. University of Maine, Center for Research on Sustainable Forests. http://www.nefismembers.org/documents/ecological-reserves-in-maine-initial-results-of-long-term-monitoring

Li, R.; Weiskittel, A.; Dick, A.R.; Kershaw Jr., J.A.; Seymour, R.S. 2012. Regional stem taper equations for eleven conifer species in the Acadian region of North America: Development and assessment. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 29, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.5849/njaf.10-037

Navar, J.; Dominguez-Calleros, P.A.; Rodriguez-Flores, F.J.; Lizárraga-Mendiola, L.; de Hoogh, R.; Synnott, T.J. 2016. A stand growth and yield model for northern reforested stands of Mexico. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural Resource Sciences, 8, 25–34.

Nord-Larsen, T.; Johannsen, V.K. 2007. A state-space approach to stand growth modelling of European beech. Annals of Forest Science, 64, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007013

Pamerleau-Couture, E.; Krause, C.; Pothier, D.; Weiskittel, A. 2015. Effect of three partial cutting practices on stand structure and growth of residual black spruce trees in north-eastern Quebec. Forestry, 88(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv017

Peng, C. 2000. Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future. Forest Ecology and Management, 132, 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00229-7

Pienaar, L.V.; Shiver, B.D. 1986. Basal area prediction and projection equations for pine plantations. Forest Science, 32, 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/32.3.626

R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org

Rehfeldt, G.E. 2006. A spline model of climate for the western United States. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-165. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-165

Robinson, A.P.; Wykoff, W.R. 2004. Imputing missing height measures using a mixed-effects modeling strategy. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 2492–2500. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-137

Rose, C.E.; Cieszewski, C.J.; Carmean, W.H. 2003. Three methods for avoiding the impacts of incompatible site index and height prediction models demonstrated on jack pine curves for Ontario. Forestry Chronicle, 79, 928–935. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc79928-5

Rowe, J.S. 1972. Forest regions of Canada. Canadian Forestry Service Publication No. 1300. Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service.

Seymour, R.S.; Meyer, S.R.; Wagner, R.G. 2014. The Cooperative Forestry Research Unit Commercial Thinning Research Network: 9-year results. In: Kenefic, L.S.; Brissette, J.C. (Comps.). Penobscot Experimental Forest: 60 years of research and demonstration in Maine, 1950–2010. General Technical Report NRS-P-123. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

Skovsgaard, J.P.; Vanclay, J.K. 2013. Forest site productivity: a review of spatial and temporal variability in natural site conditions. Forestry, 86(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt010

Stankova, T.V. 2015. A dynamic whole-stand growth model, derived from allometric relationships. Silva Fennica, 50, 1406. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1406

Stankova, T.; Diéguez-Aranda, U. 2012. A tentative dynamic site index model for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) plantations in Bulgaria. Silva Balcanica, 13(1), 5–19.

Sullivan, A.D.; Clutter, J.L. 1972. A simultaneous growth and yield model for loblolly pine. Forest Science, 18, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/18.1.76

Tait, D.E.; Cieszewski, C.J.; Bella, I.E. 1988. The stand dynamics of lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 1255–1260. https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-193

Tewari, V.P.; Singh, B. 2018. A first-approximation simple dynamic growth model for forest teak plantations in Gujarat State of India. Southern Forests, 80, 59–65. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1277644

Tewari, V.P.; Álvarez-González, J.G.; Garcia, O. 2014. Developing a dynamic growth model for teak plantations in India. Forest Ecosystems, 1, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-5620-1-9

USDA. 2010. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.

Vanclay, J.K. 2009. Tree diameter, height and stocking in even-aged forests. Annals of Forest Science, 66, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009063

Wagle, B.H.; Weiskittel, A.R.; Kizha, A.R.; Berrill, J.P.; D'Amato, A.W.; Marshall, D. 2022. Long-term influence of commercial thinning on stand structure and yield with/without pre-commercial thinning of spruce-fir in northern Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 522, 120453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120453

Waldy, J.; Kershaw Jr., J.A.; Weiskittel, A.; Ducey, M.J. 2021. Comparison of time-based versus state-space stand growth models for tropical hybrid Eucalyptus clonal plantations in Sumatera, Indonesia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 51, 1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0499

Weiskittel, A.R.; Wagner, R.G.; Seymour, R.S. 2010. Refinement of the Forest Vegetation Simulator, northeastern variant growth and yield model: Phase 1. In: Meyer, S.R. (Ed.). 2009 Cooperative Forestry Research Unit Annual Report. University of Maine, Orono, ME.

Weiskittel, A.R.; Hann, D.W.; Kershaw Jr., J.A.; Vanclay, J. 2011a. Forest growth and yield: Concepts and applications. Wiley-Blackwell, New York. 430 pp.

Weiskittel, A.R.; Wagner, R.G.; Seymour, R.S. 2011b. Refinement of the Forest Vegetation Simulator, northeastern variant growth and yield model: Phase 2. In: Mercier, W.J.; Nelson, A.S. (Eds.). Cooperative Forestry Research Unit 2010 Annual Report. University of Maine, Orono, ME.

Weiskittel, A.; Li, R. 2012. Development of regional taper and volume equations: hardwood species. In: Roth, B.E. (Ed.). Cooperative Forestry Research Unit: 2011 Annual Report. University of Maine, Orono, ME.

Woodall, C.W.; Miles, P.D.; Vissage, J.S. 2005. Determining maximum stand density index in mixed species stands for strategic-scale stocking assessments. Forest Ecology and Management, 216, 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.050

Woodall, C.W.; Weiskittel, A.R. 2021. Relative density of United States forests has shifted to higher levels over last two decades with important implications for future dynamics. Scientific Reports, 11, 18848. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98244-w


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


   

© 2008 Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences